Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Idea: Resume workflow from point of failure #1284

Open
MarkRoddick opened this issue Feb 17, 2018 · 15 comments
Open

Feature Idea: Resume workflow from point of failure #1284

MarkRoddick opened this issue Feb 17, 2018 · 15 comments

Comments

@MarkRoddick
Copy link

ISSUE TYPE
  • Feature Idea
COMPONENT NAME
  • API
  • UI
SUMMARY

Currently you can only rerun individual templates that have executed or failed as part of the workflow. It would be nice to be able to restart from failure and continue with the rest of the workflow.

@AlanCoding
Copy link
Member

A workflow's execution can take multiple branches simultaneously, and some nodes could have already traversed their "failure" or "always" connections. The best feature spec I could imagine would be to start again on all filed nodes that ended their branch. There's appeal as an analog to retry on failed hosts for job templates, but I think it would be difficult to communicate its function.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 31, 2018

Any update on this feature?

@cvernooy23
Copy link

Another way to do it is to leave it up to users. Select the template to start at and run from there with the understanding that any variables that were set in previous jobs would not exist anymore and that some branches could have already been passed. This way operators of the system can decide which is the better option for the specific workflow, start from the beginning or continue.

@sumkincpp
Copy link
Contributor

+1 On this feature. Definitely must have in roadmap.

After solving all necessary problems engineer goes to specific failure node job(linked with wf) and relaunches it, thus continuing workflow execution.

@boagg

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@spsingh1982
Copy link

When is this getting released?

@ryanpetrello
Copy link
Contributor

@spsingh1982 whenever somebody writes the code 😉

@ravitejajyosula

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@bobmacks

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@sub6as

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@Joey-ibm

This comment was marked as duplicate.

1 similar comment
@grcunha

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@kvprasoon
Copy link

kvprasoon commented Jul 18, 2020

I think giving a 👍 on the Idea will be better than a comment with +1. We can avoid mail storm :-)

@Gratizzz
Copy link

Gratizzz commented Jun 7, 2022

Is it on the roadmap? Really need this feature as well.

@hgonzalerh
Copy link

I'm seeing interest in this from large organizations with multi-hour workflows. +1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests