Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can our scheduling increase the mutual arrangement of ETL task types?(咱们的调度是否可以增加ETL任务类型之间的相互编排) #1033

Open
sancong opened this issue Oct 16, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
feature new feature

Comments

@sancong
Copy link

sancong commented Oct 16, 2019

咱们的调度是否可以增加ETL任务类型之间的相互编排? 比如不同的抽取方式提供不同的任务节点类型,不同的转换方式提供不同任务节点类型,不同的加载方式也提供有不同的任务节点类型,所有的节点之间可以相互的编排。

Can our scheduling increase the mutual arrangement of ETL task types? For example, different extraction methods provide different task node types, different conversion methods provide different task node types, different loading methods also provide different task node types, and all nodes can be arranged mutually.

@sancong sancong added the feature new feature label Oct 16, 2019
@davidzollo
Copy link
Contributor

I'm sorry, I can't understand you said, could you give some examples?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants