Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use local Docker instance when building custom sandboxes #317

Closed
mlejva opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Use local Docker instance when building custom sandboxes #317

mlejva opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Improvement Created by Linear-GitHub Sync

Comments

@mlejva
Copy link
Member

mlejva commented Feb 21, 2024

Currently, when a user runs e2b build we upload the Docker context to our backend and build the image there.

This bring several drawbacks like slowness, bad DX because we don't support multi-stage builds or private images, and requirement from us to manage this whole service.

Instead, we should let users to build their images locally (or in CI).

We would have two commands (naming can change):

  1. e2b build - builds the image locally and pushes it to our backend
  2. e2b push <docker-image-specifier>- pushes the image to our backend
@mlejva mlejva added the Improvement Created by Linear-GitHub Sync label Feb 21, 2024
@jakubno
Copy link
Member

jakubno commented Mar 24, 2024

Solved by e2b-dev/infra#103 and #338

@jakubno jakubno closed this as completed Mar 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Improvement Created by Linear-GitHub Sync
Projects
Status: 🚢 Shipped
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants