-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 510
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Teams integration #4386
Teams integration #4386
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates primarily focus on enhancing the GitHub Actions workflows for the repository. A new job named Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/pr.yml (2)
22-38
: Ensure secure handling of GitHub tokens and user credentials.Verification successful
The search across the repository did not find any additional references to the
secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN
outside of the specific workflow file under review. This suggests that the token is used in a restricted and potentially secure manner, as it is not exposed or referenced elsewhere in the codebase. Based on this evidence, the handling of the GitHub token in the workflow appears to be secure.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the GitHub token and user credentials are securely handled. # Test: Search for the GitHub token usage in the repository. Expect: Secure practices. rg --type yaml 'secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN' --glob '*.yml'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search for the GitHub token usage to include all file types in the repository. # Test: Search for the GitHub token usage across all files in the repository. Expect: Secure practices. rg 'secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN'Length of output: 34
41-44
: Verify the behavior when theteams
job fails.Verification successful
The behavior of the
all-tests
job when theteams
job fails has been confirmed through the workflow configuration. Theall-tests
job is set to proceed only if all dependent jobs, including theteams
job, succeed. This matches the expected behavior outlined in the review comment.
- The
all-tests
job is correctly configured to not proceed if theteams
job fails, as indicated by the condition in the workflow file.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the behavior of the `all-tests` job when the `teams` job fails. # Test: Simulate a failure in the `teams` job and observe the behavior of the `all-tests` job. # Expect: The `all-tests` job should not proceed if the `teams` job fails. echo "Simulating failure in 'teams' job..." # Simulate failure scenario hereLength of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the GitHub Actions workflow file to confirm the behavior when the 'teams' job fails. # Use 'cat' to display the content of the workflow file where the 'all-tests' job is defined. cat .github/workflows/pr.ymlLength of output: 1165
063f2d7
to
d44440e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
0c91db9
to
de9692e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
de9692e
to
c0753ae
Compare
c0753ae
to
445b35f
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4386 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 99.27% 16.01% -83.27%
============================================
Files 47 807 +760
Lines 16212 89340 +73128
Branches 0 1342 +1342
============================================
- Hits 16095 14308 -1787
- Misses 117 75032 +74915
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
911664f
to
31941db
Compare
31941db
to
6093046
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/pr.yml (2)
22-38
: Ensure the security of the GitHub token and validate the workflow parameters.Verification successful
Let's verify the usage of the GitHub token and other parameters in the workflow file by searching for their occurrences and ensuring they are used correctly.
The verification confirms that the GitHub token and other parameters are used correctly in the workflow file.
- The
github_token
is correctly referenced as${{ secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN }}
.- The
client_payload
correctly includes${{ github.event.pull_request.user }}
and${{ github.event.number }}
.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the security settings for the GitHub token and the correctness of the workflow parameters. # Test: Check the repository settings for the token permissions. gh api /repos/voxel51/fiftyone/actions/secrets/FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN --jq '.permissions'Length of output: 285
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the GitHub token and other parameters in the workflow file. # Search for the usage of the GitHub token in the workflow file. rg 'secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/pr.yml # Search for the usage of other parameters in the workflow file. rg 'github.event.pull_request.user' .github/workflows/pr.yml rg 'github.event.number' .github/workflows/pr.ymlLength of output: 475
41-44
: Validate the conditional logic and dependencies in theall-tests
job.Verification successful
The
all-tests
job is correctly defined with dependencies on thebuild
,teams
, andtest
jobs. The conditional logic within thesteps
section is also correctly implemented to run only if all dependencies succeed.
.github/workflows/pr.yml
:all-tests: runs-on: ubuntu-latest needs: [build, teams, test] if: always() steps: - run: sh -c ${{ needs.build.result == 'success' && needs.teams.result == 'success' && needs.test.result == 'success' }}Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conditional logic and dependencies in the `all-tests` job. # Test: Check the workflow execution logs to ensure the conditional logic is functioning as expected. gh run list --workflow pr.yml --limit 5Length of output: 573
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the execution details of the `all-tests` job to ensure it respects the conditional logic based on the results of its dependencies. # Fetch the latest 5 runs of the `all-tests` job to check their statuses and dependencies. gh run list --workflow pr.yml --limit 5 --json name,status,conclusion,startedAt,completedAt --jq '.[] | select(.name == "all-tests")'Length of output: 362
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the execution details of the `all-tests` job to ensure it respects the conditional logic based on the results of its dependencies. # Fetch the latest 5 runs of the `all-tests` job to check their statuses and dependencies. gh run list --workflow pr.yml --limit 5 --json name,status,conclusion,startedAt,updatedAt --jq '.[] | select(.name == "all-tests")'Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and configuration of the `all-tests` job in the workflow file. # Search for the `all-tests` job definition in the workflow file. rg 'all-tests' .github/workflows/pr.ymlLength of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full definition of the `all-tests` job from the workflow file. # Extract the `all-tests` job definition from the workflow file. awk '/all-tests:/,/^[^ ]/' .github/workflows/pr.ymlLength of output: 280
e51ae5b
to
c80cf64
Compare
c80cf64
to
c01eb37
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
945bffc
to
9e4bab0
Compare
9e4bab0
to
c967796
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/push-release.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/push-release.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/push-release.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/push-release.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is gonna be fun to watch!
lint: | ||
uses: ./.github/workflows/lint-app.yml | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you alphabetize the jobs? I... I've never been so happy!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
* teams merge step * add merge event * skip merge call, use pull number * add assignee * use actor * only develop for now * use branch * rm teams requirement * bump interval * add fetch depth * add bot author * use develop * alphabetize
* bump version for v0.24.1 * bump desktop * Teams integration (#4386) * teams merge step * add merge event * skip merge call, use pull number * add assignee * use actor * only develop for now * use branch * rm teams requirement * bump interval * add fetch depth * add bot author * use develop * alphabetize --------- Co-authored-by: Benjamin Kane <ben@voxel51.com>
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Automated integration into the Teams SDK
What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?
fiftyone
Python library changesSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
fetch-depth: 0
parameter.