Wirth's law: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 April 2024

7 January 2024

13 October 2023

12 October 2023

28 January 2023

14 December 2022

11 November 2022

  • curprev 19:1419:14, 11 November 202235.139.154.158 talk 6,607 bytes −45 Undid revision 1104964860 by Smartcom5 (talk) his nationality is irrelevant; "computer scientist" isn't hyphenated; "&" is inappropriate in running text; adding "information scientist" is overkill, and mayyyyyybe "computer scientist" would be okay to leave in, so will do so undo

4 November 2022

25 October 2022

22 October 2022

17 August 2022

20 May 2022

10 April 2022

22 December 2021

5 December 2021

30 November 2021

8 July 2021

25 March 2021

20 February 2021

31 January 2021

29 November 2020

27 November 2020

16 October 2020

13 April 2020

2 February 2020

28 January 2020

27 December 2019

25 December 2019

17 October 2019

11 October 2019

19 September 2019

24 August 2019

10 July 2019

25 June 2019

29 May 2019

14 December 2018

4 October 2018

3 August 2018

  • curprev 13:2613:26, 3 August 201894.193.73.59 talk 6,118 bytes −636 Although the reference is valid and performance increases in algorithms does outpace Moore's law, the conclusion ("In reality the opposite is true") misses the the point of the law - software speed in day to day usage, Gates' law without the time and scale estimates. There's room in the article for the references, but not that conclusion. undo

10 July 2018

26 January 2018

7 January 2018

9 December 2017

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)