Improving SEO for Discussions and Issues #40281
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
|
Hi there @cgarciae and welcome to our community! Thank you for the feedback! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @cgarciae, thank you for the feedback. I'm an Engineering Manager on the Discussions team 👋 We've done some work in the past to improve discussions SEO, but have recently received feedback similar to yours that suggests we have more work to do here to improve SEO. I've added your feedback to our existing internal issue and will continue to work with our Discussions leads to prioritize and move this forward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is there any progress? I still have this issue. For example, when googling for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Publish Relevant, Authoritative Content . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Apologies for replying to an old thread. I'd like to know if there has been much work on this topic. Big fan of discussions, but Google searches often struggle to surface relevant content from discussion threads even when using exact search for discussion titles, etc. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Hi Github!
On Flax we've notice that SEO is a bit poor for our Issues and Discussions, for example if we search for google/flax#2609 verbatim by the title e.g. "flax simplify submodule access from top-level Module", Google cannot find it. We are wondering if there is something we can do or if its something Github could improve on? As you know Issues and Discussion can often serve as documentation so these being easily discovered is important for us.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions