The new, darker blue in links #51233
Replies: 6 comments 8 replies
-
(Moved from #51251) Yes, the default color of links ( to the older one: I think at least having the option to switch back to the old color would be great for accessibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For anyone else bothered by this, here's a Tapermonkey script that reverts some of the colors:
Does anyone know the previous hex colors of the other UI color elements which changed? It seems like the normal grey text color has also changed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, I agree that the link color in the dark theme is harder to read. But we're somewhat limited in our options. 😞 The WCAG 2.0 accessibility rules state that the link color needs a contrast ratio of Some options:
Has anyone come across a great solution for blue links on a dark background that is fully accessible? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Another option might be to switch to the
Since the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The new dark mode appears in some ways worse than the old dark mode, I'm still only able to use the high contrast dark mode. This blog post: 2023-03-28-light-and-dark-theme claims an improvement but it appears that it actually is a de-enhancement, and an accessibility fail. Notice that I made the URL bold in an attempt to make it more readable. IMPORTANTWCAG 2 contrast math cannot calculate for dark modeIt's incapable of that and this is well known and well documented. WCAG 2 contrast was put forth circa 2007, a time when sites had light backgrounds and dark text, and dark mode was rare. WCAG 2 contrast was never empirically tested, was not peer-reviewed, and essentially cherry picks references from some obsolete standards and an informal conference paper. It was objected to by IBM and other stakeholders but was pushed forward anyway. There are perceptually uniform methods that can be used today for dark mode that are actually accessible. LAWThere is a small faction of individuals who are claiming "you have to do WCAG 2 because it's law", but that's not exactly true, and there are legal exceptions depending on jurisdiction, particularly for alternate facilitation and for using a different method that's a demonstrated improvement. Also, WCAG2 only requires a single version to comply (or if using an automated mode like a media query then the default modes for each media query that is not directly user settable), all other, alternate versions can be using any method desirable. And what is desirable is actual accessibility. Claims that one should be using WCAG 2 for dark mode are misinformed.Actual accessibility is what is legal, and actual accessibility should be the goal, not enslavement to arbitrary numbers that have no empirical evidence nor peer review to support them. For information regarding the current state of the art, here is a peer reviewed article on the topic: Realities And Myths Of Color And Contrast the article describes many of the misunderstandings on this topic and presents useful guidance for moving forward. Thank you for reading, Andy Andrew Somers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am a partially visually impaired coder and use firefox to override the text and link colors. I am not sure if some update has broken this but this is a nice way to allow users to pick their own colors. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
I noticed that the blue in links got darker. This reduces the contrast between the background and foreground in the dark mode. Whilst personally it only looks bad imo, it definitely reduces accessibility.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions