Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide packages for ARM architectures #2870

Open
imrehg opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 10 comments · Fixed by #4132
Open

Provide packages for ARM architectures #2870

imrehg opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 10 comments · Fixed by #4132

Comments

@imrehg
Copy link
Contributor

imrehg commented Jul 29, 2019

Should provide packages which can be used e.g. on Raspbian to burn image when running on a Raspberry Pi. Currently should be possible to build from source, but packages would make things a lot easier for users.

@balena-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

[imrehg] This issue has attached support thread https://jel.ly.fish/#/support-thread~47d7faac-6cff-42b5-be3e-4d5c80303bd0

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor

lurch commented Jul 29, 2019

Duplicate of #2748 ? (amongst other similar requests)

EDIT: Ignore this comment - #2748 has been closed whereas this issue ( #2870 ) is remaining open.

@Botspot
Copy link

Botspot commented Jan 9, 2020

Pi-Apps makes it easy to install Etcher.

https://github.com/Botspot/pi-apps

@jellyfish-bot
Copy link

[rahul-thakoor] This issue has attached support thread https://jel.ly.fish/f2d3ae32-56f8-4034-96e6-7edab4ae50ad

@kkarhan
Copy link

kkarhan commented Dec 16, 2021

Any developments on this issue?

After all it should just be another build target in the existing pipeline...
#2870 (comment)

@jellyfish-bot
Copy link

[hraftery] This has attached https://jel.ly.fish/44af0702-ef6e-4cfc-8b63-70dac562c765

@theofficialgman
Copy link

theofficialgman commented Dec 15, 2022

@Botspot please delete/edit your posts here that refer to balena-etcher-electron.
it is being referenced in other posts and users who don't look hard will end up with this bad out of date package that doesn't match the upstream naming scheme

@Botspot
Copy link

Botspot commented Dec 15, 2022

Done.

@theofficialgman
Copy link

theofficialgman commented Dec 21, 2023

@dfunckt issue should be reopened. No armhf and arm64 Linux packages are being produced which is what this issue requested.

@dfunckt
Copy link
Member

dfunckt commented Dec 22, 2023

You are right of course, in my haste I mistook the issue to be about Apple Silicon builds and didn’t read the discussion.

I spend a lot of time trying to get cross compilation going but couldn’t and I had to move on. I haven’t given up though, will give it another go as soon as I get a chance.

@dfunckt dfunckt reopened this Dec 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants